The 4-2-3-1 has become a standard formation not just in Germany, but at elite-level football clubs the world over. Surely the most striking Bundesliga example of recent years was Jupp Heynckes ...
This report analyses the key movements Atletico Madrid use to neutralise situations of numerical inferiority, when utilising a 4-4-2 formation against opposing team’s playing 4-3-3 in the Champions League knock out stage. The report will: Compare and contrast the 4-4-2 and 4-3-3 formations. Analyse how Atletico Madrid press high up the pitch.
More Soccer Formations 4 4 2 Vs 4 3 3 images
Weaknesses of the 4-2-3-1: The team risks being exposed out wide if the wingers don’t track back and support their fullback. The 4-2-3-1 formation relies on superb discipline and organisation. Even more so than other formations, everyone must work together as a unit both offensively and defensively.
Answer (1 of 5): When the defence is weak or team needs to defend after having a lead, 4–2–3–1 is a good formation. When a team lacks variety of midfielders or needs wing attack or have at least two versatile center-mids, then 4–4–2 is to be used.
The 4-4-2 formation is the standard formation. Every player knows how to play in it and the beauty of the formation is that there are clear roles and expectations for each player. While other formations such as 3-4-3 demand a high level of tactical discipline and knowledge of the game, the 4-4-2 is less taxing in this respect.
See more videos for Soccer Formations 4 4 2 Vs 4 3 3
Learn soccer formations4-4-2 formation guide4-3-3 formation guide4-2-4 formation guide
3-4-3 system of play should only be used if the opponent is playing with preferably 1, at most 2 attacking players. Teams that use this soccer formation effectively are usually mature teams with a lot of zonal system experience. The strength of 3-4-3 Soccer Formation comes from the midfield and forward line. The weakness is the 3 man defense.
An example of such a change is a change from 4–5–1 to 4–4–2, 3–5–2 to 3–4–3, or even 5–3–2 to 4–3–3. Change to defensive formations . When a team is in the lead, or wishes to protect the scoreline of a game, the coach may choose to revert to a more defensive structure by removing a forward for a more defensive player.